<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Steal Your Competitor&#8217;s Link Building Strategies In 3&#8230;2&#8230;1&#8230;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.semvironment.com/steal-your-competitors-link-building-strategies-in-321/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.semvironment.com/steal-your-competitors-link-building-strategies-in-321/</link>
	<description>Turning Clicks Into Customers</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 03 Aug 2010 20:15:39 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Doodee</title>
		<link>http://www.semvironment.com/steal-your-competitors-link-building-strategies-in-321/comment-page-1/#comment-243</link>
		<dc:creator>Doodee</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Feb 2008 17:39:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.semvironment.com/steal-your-competitors-link-building-strategies-in-321/#comment-243</guid>
		<description>Thanks for sharing</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for sharing</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Doug Heil</title>
		<link>http://www.semvironment.com/steal-your-competitors-link-building-strategies-in-321/comment-page-1/#comment-37</link>
		<dc:creator>Doug Heil</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Dec 2007 15:16:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.semvironment.com/steal-your-competitors-link-building-strategies-in-321/#comment-37</guid>
		<description>Of course; this is assuming you really care about link building and such things like that. I do to a certain point.

What I don&#039;t agree with is the notion that you have a client who follows all rules of search engines, and that client has a competitor who is spamming the se&#039;s, and the idea that you should not OUT that website. That is absurd thinking.

That debra person from that link building firm seems to not want to help her own clients as much as possible, so she never OUTS anyone? That&#039;s nutty stuff. If you are playing fair, and you see another site not playing fair; why the hell would you not out that website? Sheesh.

It amazes me the people who claim they are whitehat, but yet fail to do the most basic of things for their clients. Any client would be appalled at the idea of not outing a competitor who spams the search engines.

If you knew a person was cheating at playing cards for money and you did not tell anyone about it; what do you think others would think of you for not telling everyone about that person? My goodness; the absurdity of our industry is astounding.

my 2 cents.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Of course; this is assuming you really care about link building and such things like that. I do to a certain point.</p>
<p>What I don&#8217;t agree with is the notion that you have a client who follows all rules of search engines, and that client has a competitor who is spamming the se&#8217;s, and the idea that you should not OUT that website. That is absurd thinking.</p>
<p>That debra person from that link building firm seems to not want to help her own clients as much as possible, so she never OUTS anyone? That&#8217;s nutty stuff. If you are playing fair, and you see another site not playing fair; why the hell would you not out that website? Sheesh.</p>
<p>It amazes me the people who claim they are whitehat, but yet fail to do the most basic of things for their clients. Any client would be appalled at the idea of not outing a competitor who spams the search engines.</p>
<p>If you knew a person was cheating at playing cards for money and you did not tell anyone about it; what do you think others would think of you for not telling everyone about that person? My goodness; the absurdity of our industry is astounding.</p>
<p>my 2 cents.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jameszol</title>
		<link>http://www.semvironment.com/steal-your-competitors-link-building-strategies-in-321/comment-page-1/#comment-36</link>
		<dc:creator>jameszol</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Dec 2007 13:09:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.semvironment.com/steal-your-competitors-link-building-strategies-in-321/#comment-36</guid>
		<description>Gab, that was a very valuable comment! Thank you!

I would submit that finding a competitor&#039;s network takes a little bit of work but it can be done - if it is a big enough network and they Privatize their domain registrations then it would be very difficult. Thoughts?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Gab, that was a very valuable comment! Thank you!</p>
<p>I would submit that finding a competitor&#8217;s network takes a little bit of work but it can be done &#8211; if it is a big enough network and they Privatize their domain registrations then it would be very difficult. Thoughts?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gab Goldenberg</title>
		<link>http://www.semvironment.com/steal-your-competitors-link-building-strategies-in-321/comment-page-1/#comment-35</link>
		<dc:creator>Gab Goldenberg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Dec 2007 05:09:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.semvironment.com/steal-your-competitors-link-building-strategies-in-321/#comment-35</guid>
		<description>I posted about this &lt;a href=&quot;http://cityseo.blogspot.com/2006/12/first-step-to-link-building.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;technique a while back&lt;/a&gt;, but I like this update you&#039;ve given on it with SEO Quake. Seems the tool gives you an ability to manipulate the data to make it more useful.

That said, most intermediate+ SEOs are familiar with this technique. When you want to get advanced you take the next logical step and hide your backlinks with a network. So you don&#039;t buy links directly to your money site or link comments to it. You send those to your supporting cast of sites. They pass the link juice on, and make it damn difficult for others to replicate your links, short of analyzing your various tier 2 sites as well.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I posted about this <a href="http://cityseo.blogspot.com/2006/12/first-step-to-link-building.html">technique a while back</a>, but I like this update you&#8217;ve given on it with SEO Quake. Seems the tool gives you an ability to manipulate the data to make it more useful.</p>
<p>That said, most intermediate+ SEOs are familiar with this technique. When you want to get advanced you take the next logical step and hide your backlinks with a network. So you don&#8217;t buy links directly to your money site or link comments to it. You send those to your supporting cast of sites. They pass the link juice on, and make it damn difficult for others to replicate your links, short of analyzing your various tier 2 sites as well.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jameszol</title>
		<link>http://www.semvironment.com/steal-your-competitors-link-building-strategies-in-321/comment-page-1/#comment-32</link>
		<dc:creator>jameszol</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Dec 2007 04:14:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.semvironment.com/steal-your-competitors-link-building-strategies-in-321/#comment-32</guid>
		<description>Pepperjam can handle it. They&#039;re a great company.

Thanks for your comment/compliment! :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Pepperjam can handle it. They&#8217;re a great company.</p>
<p>Thanks for your comment/compliment! <img src='http://www.semvironment.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Seo Design Solutions</title>
		<link>http://www.semvironment.com/steal-your-competitors-link-building-strategies-in-321/comment-page-1/#comment-31</link>
		<dc:creator>Seo Design Solutions</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Dec 2007 03:58:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.semvironment.com/steal-your-competitors-link-building-strategies-in-321/#comment-31</guid>
		<description>Alright,

Who let you in to our TOP secret Link snagging tutorial?

Just kidding, SEO Quake is an awesome tool, gotta love it, but I admit you hit pay dirt on the methodology for finding the sweet spot.

Very nice post, although Pepperjam may not be as excited as the rest of us (as the stand in frog for biology prop). From my summation that strategy is an SEO Defense / Insulation Technique to defend position as opposed to improve it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Alright,</p>
<p>Who let you in to our TOP secret Link snagging tutorial?</p>
<p>Just kidding, SEO Quake is an awesome tool, gotta love it, but I admit you hit pay dirt on the methodology for finding the sweet spot.</p>
<p>Very nice post, although Pepperjam may not be as excited as the rest of us (as the stand in frog for biology prop). From my summation that strategy is an SEO Defense / Insulation Technique to defend position as opposed to improve it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
