<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Pay Per Click Advertising Weekly Roundup</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.semvironment.com/pay-per-click-advertising-weekly-roundup-10/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.semvironment.com/pay-per-click-advertising-weekly-roundup-10/</link>
	<description>Turning Clicks Into Customers</description>
	<pubDate>Sun, 05 Jul 2009 03:09:18 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Doodee</title>
		<link>http://www.semvironment.com/pay-per-click-advertising-weekly-roundup-10/comment-page-1/#comment-235</link>
		<dc:creator>Doodee</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 Jan 2008 19:47:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.semvironment.com/pay-per-click-advertising-weekly-roundup-10/#comment-235</guid>
		<description>Thanks for sharing</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for sharing</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dr. Pete</title>
		<link>http://www.semvironment.com/pay-per-click-advertising-weekly-roundup-10/comment-page-1/#comment-89</link>
		<dc:creator>Dr. Pete</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Jan 2008 21:52:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.semvironment.com/pay-per-click-advertising-weekly-roundup-10/#comment-89</guid>
		<description>James: Yeah, that seemed to be everyone's question, and I realized I didn't explain it well. In this case, I'm using both. The client is essentially an affiliate, and the "product" names aren't unique and can be long. We are testing using the name in the URL  as well as on-screen, but also wanted a unique and easy-to-recognize product ID that wasn't just a dB-assigned number.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>James: Yeah, that seemed to be everyone&#8217;s question, and I realized I didn&#8217;t explain it well. In this case, I&#8217;m using both. The client is essentially an affiliate, and the &#8220;product&#8221; names aren&#8217;t unique and can be long. We are testing using the name in the URL  as well as on-screen, but also wanted a unique and easy-to-recognize product ID that wasn&#8217;t just a dB-assigned number.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jameszol</title>
		<link>http://www.semvironment.com/pay-per-click-advertising-weekly-roundup-10/comment-page-1/#comment-86</link>
		<dc:creator>jameszol</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Jan 2008 13:39:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.semvironment.com/pay-per-click-advertising-weekly-roundup-10/#comment-86</guid>
		<description>Dr. Pete,

I should post my questions directly to your blog - but my biggest question was probably this: why use product ID's when you could simply use the product name instead of any ID?

-James</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dr. Pete,</p>
<p>I should post my questions directly to your blog - but my biggest question was probably this: why use product ID&#8217;s when you could simply use the product name instead of any ID?</p>
<p>-James</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dr. Pete</title>
		<link>http://www.semvironment.com/pay-per-click-advertising-weekly-roundup-10/comment-page-1/#comment-75</link>
		<dc:creator>Dr. Pete</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Jan 2008 23:57:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.semvironment.com/pay-per-click-advertising-weekly-roundup-10/#comment-75</guid>
		<description>Thanks for the mention! I'm curious, though, which part you disagree with? I think some people thought I was arguing against using product names or meaningful URLs, which I may not have communicated well. The unique IDs were simply an alternative to using your internal dB IDs (when displaying to users).

Unfortunately, I wasn't able to go into the mini-experiment in depth, as it would give away some proprietary work with the client. I wish I could've shown what we actually did, because it's pretty nifty.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the mention! I&#8217;m curious, though, which part you disagree with? I think some people thought I was arguing against using product names or meaningful URLs, which I may not have communicated well. The unique IDs were simply an alternative to using your internal dB IDs (when displaying to users).</p>
<p>Unfortunately, I wasn&#8217;t able to go into the mini-experiment in depth, as it would give away some proprietary work with the client. I wish I could&#8217;ve shown what we actually did, because it&#8217;s pretty nifty.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
